|
Contents
FEATURES
Current Highlights
Rumors & Innuendo
Depth Chart
Roster
Player Evaluations
2008 DRAFT ISSUE
Draft Summary Page
OTHER
TOPICS
History of the Cardinals
About the Big Red Sheet
Welcome From the Editor
About the Editor
Memory of a True Card Fan
Order Cardinal Tickets
Links to Cardinal Related Sites
|
|
|
OURS/NOT
THE OFFICIAL CARDINAL DEPTH CHART. COLOR KEY -
Starter/ Back Up/Injured
- IR or Cannot Play//Practice
Squad/Signed
Rookie/Not
Tendered or UFA |
|
Overview -
Training Camp opens tomorrow. Barring anything really crazy, the training
camp roster is set. We know who we've got, but we only have past
performance to go on to give us a partial picture of what they can
bring to the table. There are new players, rehabbing players, improved
players, psyched players and maybe even a few complacent players who will
make the trip up to Flag. How all of this will sort out is the reason why
we're writing this.
For the first
time, we're turning to the folks who publish Pro Football Prospectus
to hopefully make us all smarter when checking out the Cardinals. These are
the guys who have dissected every imaginable statistic and have broken down
nearly every assignment on every play in every NFL game to create more
meaningful measures of player, team and strategic effectiveness. The most
useful measures include:
DVOA (“Defense-Adjusted
Value-Over Average”)
The DVOA is a complex and universal player and team rating stat that
factors in such elements as: Down & Distance, Game Situation,
Caliber of Opposing Offense/Defense, Offensive/Defensive Scheme Faced and
Player Matchups - to assign a value to every player, unit and team's
effectiveness on either side of the ball for every play charted and then
aggregate everything into a quarter, game and season. It assigns
each play a "Success Value" based,on both “total yards” and “yards needed
for a 1st down.” (A play is considered a success if it gains
45% of the needed yards on 1st Down, 65% of remaining needed yards on 2nd
down or 100% of the remaining yards on third or fourth downs) They
then compare this with the league average for similar situations to come
up with the DVOA. (Note - a positive DVOA means "above the league
average"n for the offense and below average for the defense. A negative
DVOA means "below average for the offense and above average for the
defense).
Somehow
Football Outsiders is able to make the DVOA a “universal efficiency
standard for all aspects of play - individual plays, players, defensive
units, offensive units and entire teams - both by play and for each
game the season.
DYAR (“Defense-Adjusted
Yards Above Replacement”)
It asks and
answers the question: “If this starter were to be injured, what would be
the drop off in efficiency when you brought in his backup?” In other
words, how indispensable to the team would this player be?
ALY (Adjusted Line
Average)
Isolates
offensive line effectiveness from RB effectiveness to gauge the net impact
the O-line has on any running play.
One note of caution the PFP
statistics and analysis are based on this past season's numbers; so while
they can might help us sort out what to expect in 2008, they can't 100%
predict the future. |
|
Overall Offense
Not as potent a year ago, as
we’d all think; but not all that bad either.
·
Cards ranked
near the middle of the pack in offensive efficiency (DVOA) but also ranked
fairly high (#6) in consistency & predictability.
·
They’re weak
on first downs (11.6% below the league average in DVOA efficiency) but
slightly above average on second downs (3.4%) and pretty good on third downs
(17.0% above the league average).
·
They were 3rd
best team in the Red Zone
·
Cards were
near the bottom of the league in using play action fakes.
·
In short
yardage situations, Cards lined up in 4 or 5 receiver sets more than any
other team except Detroit.
·
Cards ran the
highest percentage of screens on 3rd down (1 in every 17 plays)
·
Arizona QB’s
were hit (but not sacked) more than any other team.
·
Cards ranked 3rd
(behind NE and Jax) in 4th Quarter Passing DVOA efficiency.
·
But they
ranked #7 in 4th Quarter Running DVOA efficiency.
·
Although
Warner had a higher Passing DVOA than Leinart, Matt had the better DVOA
under pressure.
·
Leinart racked
up twice as many hurries than Warner. |
|
Quarterbacks (3)
7
Leinart,13 Warner,
02 St. Pierre, 12 Morelli
Leinart with Warner as backup makes more sense than Warner with Leinart as
backup (as you’ll see below)
·
Cards are 9.1%
ahead of the league norm in passing efficiency (DVOA)
·
Warner has a
DVAR of 699. Leinart has a DVAR vs. 58 – meaning that we’re in deeper
trouble were Kurt to go down than we would if Matt were injured.
·
The above
stats confirm that Warner is otherwise solid but with not much room for
upside growth and represents a reliable option should Leinart be injured,
whereas Leinart (who has a huge upside) hasn’t yet proved himself to be as
dependable an option should Warner be injured.
·
Warner’s DVOA
is 11.3% above the league average. Leinart’s is 3.3% below average.
·
YAC figures
are similar for both Warner (4.5) and Leinart (4.3). By comparison, Romo’s
(5.0) and Brady’s (5.1) receivers have slightly higher averages. P Manning’s
pass catchers have a 4.5 yard YAC figure when he throws to them.
·
PFP makes
mention of Warner’s tendency to put the ball on the ground and/or abort
plays at inopportune times (most notably the fumble in the end zone that
cost us one of the Niners’ games).
Questions Going In
Is Leinart's shoulder 100%? Has he, in fact, coming
along as quickly as the coaches say he is? How's Warner's elbow? Will
St. Pierre be "good to go" should we need to call on him. |
|
Running Backs (5)
RB -
32
James,
31 Shipp,
28 JJ Arrington,
30 Vincent, 33 Baylark,
34 Hightower
FB - 45 T Smith, 46 Castille,
44 D Johnson
Right now, it looks like Edge plus a whole bunch of other guys. James is one
of those guys who will get you steady yardage on every play - not costing
you much negative yardage due to a stuff but no longer breaking long runs
either. The only breakawy back on the roster is Arrington, and he's never
lived up to his predraft expectations. Shipp is mainly a pounder and both
Baylark and Hightower are between the tackles type runners without much if
any home run speed. None of our RB's have shown much skill catching out of
the backfield.
·
Cards were
13.8% below the league norm for rushing efficiency (DVOA).
·
All Cardinal
RB’s were below the league average in efficiency (including Edge – who was
1.0% below the league average in DVOA).
·
Edge had an
overall Success rate of 46%. (Shipp had 40%. JJ had 27%). Compare this with
Peterson (45%),Westbrook (53%), Tomlinson (45%) and Edge didn’t do too badly
other than not displaying breakaway speed.
·
Card RB’s
ranked dead last in gains of 10+ yards past the line of scrimmage.
·
Among RB’s,
Arrington caught 74% of the balls thrown his way. Edge caught 64%. Shipp
(“hands of stone”) only caught 29%.
·
But, when
catching passes, Edge is 11.2% below the league average in efficiency. (JJ
is 5.5% above average).
·
Cardinal RB’s
only caught one TD pass last year.
Questions
Going In
Can Edge stay healthy? If he can't, what would we do then? Will Hightower
prove to be faster than his predraft numbers? Will light bulbs finally go
off for JJ? |
|
Wide Receivers (5 or
6)
WRX -
81 Boldin,
87 Morey, 85 Urban,
86 Merritt
WRZ -80 Doucet, 15 Breaston,
18
Cornelius
WRH -
11 Fitzgerald,
10 Rector,19 Long
Right now, it’s Fitz and
Boldin. Urban has nicer than expected stats. We were kind of surprised
Breaston’s stats weren’t better. There is definitely an opening for Early
Doucet and other Cardinal backups to fill the #3 - #5 roles.
·
Boldin’s
overall efficiency (DVOA) is 16.3% above league average. Fitzgerald’s is
9.1%. Urban’s is a surprising 22.4% above league average.
·
Fitz’s
replacement value (DYAR) is 291. Boldin’s is 229. Urban comes in at 101.
·
Q catches
catches 71% of the balls thrown to him. Fitz 60%. Moss averaged 61%, Owens
57%, Reggie Wayne 67% and Anthony Gonzalez an amazing 73%)
·
Boldin’s YAC
figure is 5.3 yards. Fitz’s is 2.7. (Gold Standard is TO’s 7.7. Randy Moss
only averaged 3.3).
Questions Going In
Who'll replace
Bryant Johnson? WIll it be one of the veteran standbyes like Morey, Merrit
or Urban? Will Steve Breaston make the next step upward to seize the
opportunity? WIll Doucet live up to his predraft hype and turn out to be the
next Anqyuan Boldin? (LIke Q, Doucet's predraft forty time suffered from his
being injured and he was underdrafted). ? Who (if anybody) will fill the
need for a "burner?" |
Tight Ends (3)
82 Pope, 89
Patrick, 84 Tuman,
83 Beinemann,
49 Shor
Pope is said to be
a potential red zone super star, but will need to cut down on his mistakes.
Patrick improved during the latter part of last season coming off an injury
and should push Pope to start. Tuman was added to improve run blocking.
Bienemann is more of a blocker than pass catcher.
· Patrick’s
receiving efficiency is 8.9% above the league average, while Pope is 3.6%
above the mean for the league.
·
Pope is
catching 68% of the balls thrown his way. Patrick grabbed 58%. (By way of
comparison: K Winslow only caught 55% and A Gates grabbed 64%)
Questions Going In
Will
Pope finally live up to his predraft hype? Can Patrick beat out Pope for a
starting job? Will the addition of Tuman improve our run game? |
|
Offensive Line (8 or
9)
LT-
69 Gandy,
65 Coleman
LG-
74
Wells, 61 E
Brown
OC-
50 A
Johnson,
63 Sendlein,
64 Peters
RG-
76
Lutui,
66 Medder, 67
Satele
RT - 75 L Brown,
68 Vallejo,
72 B Keith, 60 Clifford
Improving – both in the
rushing game and protecting the passer – but with very little depth and a
lot of room to improve. PFP feels the right side, though still raw, has a
high upside while the left side, though more seasoned and reliable will need
to be upgraded soon. With the exception of Sendlein (who is expected to
challenge Johnson at center) and possibly Elton Brown, this unit is not very
deep in proven backup talent.
·
ALY was 8th
best in NFL (improved from 23rd ranking last year and dead last
in 2005).
·
Our RB’s were
stuffed only 21% of the time (8th best in NFL).
·
Cards rank 9th
in lowest adjusted sack rate (despite having 2 “statuesque” QB’s)
·
Cards ranked 4th
in running effectiveness over RT. They ranked 10th over the
middle, 13th around RE and 14th off LT. But they only
ranked 22nd running around LE.
Questions
Going In
What in the
way of unit cohesion and effectiveness will the extra year under Russ Grimm
have on this unit? Will Elton Brown advance sufficiently enough to provide
us with depth at both guard and tackle positions without any significant
loss in effectiveness? If Keith can remain sufficiently fired up, will he
flash the God-given talent the scouts expect of him? |
|
Overall Defense
·
Cardinal
defensive efficiency (DVOA) runs 5.3% below the league norm.
·
They ran 3.4%
better than the league norm stopping 1st down plays, but ran
14.6% below average defending on 2nd downs (28th
ranked) and 7.3% worse than the league average defending on 3rd
downs.
·
They were 19th
ranked team in Red Zone defense.
·
Cards had the
league best average against screens
·
Arizona ranked
#3 against passes up the middle
·
Defense was
flat-average when opponent QB was under center but ranked #31 when they
faced the shotgun.
·
Yet the Cards
only faced the shotgun 21% of the time (2nd lowest in NFL).
·
Cards rank #2
in NFL in plays where they only rush 3 men.
·
They rank #6
in sacks by a LB
·
They had zero
sacks by a DB last year. (A-Dub where were you?)
·
Cards were #10
in number of times they “went for it” on 4th down.
·
PFP makes
mention of too many Cardinal penalties (especially from Dockett and Rolle).
(Late Note - A couple of ASFN'ers point out that there is an
interrelationship between DB performance and Front Seven pass rush
effectiveness (i.e. more pressure on the QB makes a DB's job easier. This
also works the opposite way - i.e. better pass coverage makes for more QB
pressures, hurries and sacks) |
|
Defensive Line (8 or
9)
LDE- 56 Okeafor, 79 Iwebema,
95 Schobel,
UT- 90 Dockett,
96 Kolodziej,
71 B Robinson (Wesley)
NT
98 Watson, 78 Branch, 97 B Robinson
(Fresno), 73 Dykes, )
RDE/WLB 94 A Smith,
93
C Campbell, 96 Tafoya,
62 Banks
Injury-depleted unit has been bolstered by the return of injured players
and addition of rookie and FA talent. It was felt that this unit (especially
Dockett) wore down during the second half of last year due to its lack of
depth. It's tricky to gauge both depth and talent at DE or LB due to the
hybrid nature of Clancy Pendergast's defense (since both OLB's, DE's and
UT's are frequently shuffled around from position to position). Player
versatility and interchangeability of parts automatically gives us
more depth.
·
Cards were
1.4% more efficient than the league average vs. the run.
·
Injuries took
their toll last year, so it may be hard to accurately gauge how good they
might be this year assuming everyone stays healthy.
·
Ranked 9th
in league in ALY (which isolates the front seven’s impact against each
offensive play).
·
The Cardinals
ranked dead last in “Power” (which we presume means “the ability to stop
teams from running the ball down their throats).
·
If you wanted
to gain running yards against the Cardinals, you could do it over RT (where
the Cards ranked 30th in stopping the run). Everywhere else, the
Cardinal Front 7 did well (3rd against runs over LT, 6th
vs. runs up the middle, 11th vs. runs around RE and 9th
vs. runs around LE)..
·
Cards were
pretty much in the middle of the pack sacking the QB, preventing runs of 10+
yards and stuffing the run.
·
In terms of
Stop %; Antonio Smith led DL’s and LB’s with 81% followed by Dockett (77%)
and Watson (72%).
·
PFP feels
Gerald Hayes could benefit from better protection from DT’s; however,
Gabe Watson’s knee and Alan Branch’s recent conditioning deficiencies could
prove problematic.
Questions Going
In
Gabe Watson's kneecap.
Alan Branch's commitment (he was said to have reported to a minicamp in
lousy shape). Will Chike regain his preseason form of a year ago? Will
Dockett keep his grumpiness over contract on the sidelines? Will
Campbell prove to be a tall, long-armed kick and pass blocking beast or just
a tall guy who plays high? Will Iwebema be everything his position coach
thinks he'll be? Are we solid enough depth-wise inside?
|
|
Linebackers (7)
SLB- 55 LaBoy,
51 Stewart, 57 Holloway,
ILB-
54 Hayes, 52 Beisel
ILB 58 Dansby,
WLB 92 Berry,
53 Haggans,
59
Harrington, 37 Highsmith
Injuries and new
additions/departures make this the hardest unit on the team to evaluate.
B-Train will be back. LaBoy (concussion-history notwithstanding) is
considered a solid replacement for the departed Calvin Pace (who brought
both a pass rushing presence and pass coverage presence as Okeafor's
replacement as an OLB/DE). Hayes and Dansby (both backed by Beisel inside)
are considered solid - some consider Dansby to be an eventual NFL
superstar).
· Laboy
had 6 sacks last year. (Pace had 6.5)..
·
PFP feels
Gerald Hayes could benefit from better protection from DT’s; however,
Gabe Watson’s knee and Alan Branch’s recent conditioning deficiencies could
prove problematic.
· Statistically,
all LB's were statistically bunched in Run Stop percentage (in the low to
mid 60% range).
·
Pace led all LB's with a 79% Stop Rate (Dansby had 43% number. Hayes had
47%). Berry - listed as a DE - had a 73% run stop number (but defensive
linemen always have higher numbers than LB's, and Berry was listed as a LB
in Clancy's hybrid scheme).
Questions
Going In
Will
Berry be as good as new? WIl Laboy (concussions) stay healthy and will he be
as productive as Pace was last year? Can Harrington make the transition from
DE? Can Holloway prove that the one Superman blitz play he executed in
preseason a year ago was no fuke? Will Ali Highsmith be the next Dat Nguyen
or the next Buster Davis? Will Haggans prove to be the OLB clone of Monte
Beisel (i.e. more than solid in a backup role)? |
|
Defensive Backs (9)
LCB-
25
E Green, 20
R Brown,
22 Ware, 36 M Brown
RCB- 26 Hood,
29
Rodgers-Cromartie,27
Adams,
41 Bain, 23 Minter
FS-
21 Rolle,
47 Francisco, 38 Keyes
SS- 24 Wilson,35 Celestin,
22 Ware,
40 Tillman
PFP was not all
that impressed by this unit's performance a year ago. They placed most of the
blame on the shoulders of Eric Green and Antrel Rolle and felt that Rod Hood
was shouldering too much of the blame (although he did "look like a fool"
attempting to jump a route that Vinnie Testaverde and Steve Smith torched
him on). Although Rolle proved he can light things up (almost running three
picks back for long TD's all in one game) he did so in a nickel/safety role
and not as a #1 or #2 CB, where he struggled. He will replace the departed
Terence Holt at FS with Aaron Francisco pushing him. (Wherever Rolle plays,
he will have to cut way down on his number of illegal-contact penalties). Cards drafted a
spectacular athletice (though raw) corner, Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, with
their top pick. He has the size, speed and aggressiveness most secondary
coaches dream of. If he proves good enough to challenge for a starting spot,
it will be Eric Green and not Rod Hood whose job is most likely to be on the
line. Cards appear deep in young, unproven talent. It will be up to Tyrell
Austin to develop it. (Late Note - A
couple of ASFN'ers point out that there is an interrelationship between DB
performance and Front Seven pass rush effectiveness (i.e. more pressure on
the QB makes a DB's job easier)
·
Cards are
10.3% below the league norm in pass defense efficiency.
·
Cards ranked
19th in overall pass defense.
·
They ranked 26th
against other teams’ #1 receivers, 28th against their #2
receiver, 9th vs. #3 WR’s, 3rd vs. TE’s and 17th
vs. RB’s.
·
They take give
Rod Hood a pass; suggesting that Eric Green and Antrel Rolle were the main
reason for poor Cardinal numbers in the secondary.
·
Hood’s Success
Rates were 56% vs. #1 WR’s, 43% vs. #2 WR’s and 64% vs. Other WR’s.
·
Green’s’s
Success Rate indicates a drop off - 40% vs. #1 WR’s, 36% vs. #2 WR’s and
45% vs. Other WR’s.
·
Rolles’s
Success Rates against #1 and #2 WR’s were even lower at 32% and 33%
respectively. However, his 56% Success Rate vs. Other WR’s suggest a higher
level of play in a nickel, dime or safety role.
·
PFP concludes
that (a) Rolle’s move to safety is probably a good thing, and that should
Rodgers-Cromartie successfully challenge for a starting CB role, it will be
to replace Green and not Hood.
·
Last year’s
numbers help explain why Terence Holt is history. He ranked 42nd
in run stops compared to Adrian Wilson’s #3 ranking in the NFL.
·
Wilson is said
by PFP to have athleticism only rivaled by Ed Reed and Troy Polamalu.
Although he’s been often used as an extra LB in past years, they say he’s
expected to spend more time assisting Cardinal CB’s this year.
Questions
Going In
Will
Rodgers-Cromartie be good enough to start right away? To star? Will Rolle
successfully make the transition to safety? Can he play as spectacularly as
he did in that one multi-pick game a season ago? Will A-Dub bounce all the
way back - is he good to go? Will any youngsters (like Tavarous Bain or the
rookie free agent, Keyes) step up and surprise us? |
|
Special Teams (3)
K-01 Rackers
P- 09 D
Johnson
H - xx _______
LS- 48 Hodel
KR
-
28 Arrington
PR -
18 Breaston
Field position is gained or lost due
to good or poor special teams play.
PFP points out
that the Cardinals were lousy in punting and punt coverage last season.
Mitch Berger wasn't the answer as our punter last year. The hope is that
Dirk Johnson will do better. But that was only part of the story - our punt
coverage was abysmal as well. Breaston gave us a bit of a boost returning
punts, but the feeling is that JJ can do a better job returning kickoffs.
Neil Rackers had another subpar year in the FG/XP Dept., raising questions
about whether his really good season a few years back was merely a fluke.
His strong kickoff foot does help us considerably.
-
Cards ranked
26th in the league in over all Special Teams efficiency (with a DVOA 3.6%
below the league average).
-
We ranked
dead last in Net Punting efficiency losing 21.8 points in the
punting game - worse than the NFL average with the coverage team giving up
13 average yards per return only better than Indianapolis.
-
PFP reminds
us that special teams coverage effectiveness is often a reflection on the
caliber of our backup players and how well they are buying into the team
philosophy.
-
We ranked 29th in FG and
XP efficiency (6.2% below the league average).
-
But Rackers led
all NFL kickers in Kickoff Value this past season.
State of the
Position
Will Rackers regain his
FG mojo? Will our punt coverage team under Kevin Spencer make the necessary
improvement? How much impact, if any, will Breaston's stronger upper
body have on his punt returning ability. Will Dirk Johnson represent an
improvement over Mitch Berger in terms of punting yardage, hang time and
directional accuracy? |
|